💭 Motion Statistics
Round 1

āϝ⧇ āĻāύāϏāĻŋāĻĒāĻŋ āĻšāĻŋāϏ⧇āĻŦ⧇ āφāϏāĻ¨ā§āύ āϜāĻžāĻ¤ā§€ā§Ÿ āϏāĻ‚āϏāĻĻ āύāĻŋāĻ°ā§āĻŦāĻžāϚāύ⧇ āϜāĻžāĻŽāĻžā§ŸāĻžāϤ⧇āϰ āϏāĻžāĻĨ⧇ āĻœā§‹āϟ āĻ—āĻ āύ āĻ•āϰāĻŦ⧇āĨ¤ (R 1.1)

24%
24%
4 Aff wins 4 Neg wins
balance inconclusive
12%
6%
4 Aff vetoes 2 Neg vetoes
balance inconclusive

āϝ⧇ āϜ⧁āϞāĻžāχ āĻŦāĻŋāĻĒā§āϞāĻŦ⧇āϰ āĻ›āĻžāĻ¤ā§āϰāύ⧇āϤāĻžāĻĻ⧇āϰ āφāύ⧁āĻˇā§āĻ āĻžāύāĻŋāĻ• āϰāĻžāϜāύ⧈āϤāĻŋāĻ• āĻ­ā§‚āĻŽāĻŋāĻ•āĻžā§Ÿ āĻāĻ•āϟāĻŋ āϭ⧁āϞ āϏāĻŋāĻĻā§āϧāĻžāĻ¨ā§āϤāĨ¤ (R 1.2)

18%
0 Aff wins 3 Neg wins
balance inconclusive
21%
12%
7 Aff vetoes 4 Neg vetoes
imbalanced at 50% level

āϝ⧇ āϏāϰāĻ•āĻžāϰāĻŋ āĻŦāĻŋāĻļā§āĻŦāĻŦāĻŋāĻĻā§āϝāĻžāϞ⧟ āĻāϰ āĻ›āĻžāĻ¤ā§āϰāϏāĻ‚āĻ—āĻ āύāϗ⧁āϞ⧋āϤ⧇ āϜāĻžāĻŽāĻžāϤ-āĻļāĻŋāĻŦāĻŋāϰ⧇āϰ āύāĻŋāϰāĻ™ā§āϕ⧁āĻļ āĻŦāĻŋāϜ⧟ āĻŦāĻžāĻ‚āϞāĻžāĻĻ⧇āĻļ⧇āϰ āĻ­āĻŦāĻŋāĻˇā§āϝāϤ⧇āϰ āϜāĻ¨ā§āϝ āĻ­āĻžāϞ⧋āϰ āϤ⧁āϞāύāĻžā§Ÿ āĻ–āĻžāϰāĻžāĻĒ āĻŦ⧇āĻļāĻŋ āĻ•āϰāĻŦ⧇āĨ¤ (R 1.3)

24%
12%
4 Aff wins 2 Neg wins
balance inconclusive
6%
21%
2 Aff vetoes 7 Neg vetoes
balance inconclusive
Round 2

āϝ⧇ āφāĻŽāϰāĻž āĻ•āĻžāĻ°ā§āĻĄāĻŋāύāĻžāϞ āϜāĻ°ā§āϜ āĻŦāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻ—ā§‹āĻ—ā§āϞāĻŋāĻ“ (āĻĒāϰ⧇ āĻĒā§‹āĻĒ āĻĢā§āϰāĻžāĻ¨ā§āϏāĻŋāϏ) āϕ⧇ āĻĒāϰāĻŦāĻ°ā§āϤ⧀ āĻĒā§‹āĻĒ āĻšāĻŋāϏ⧇āĻŦ⧇ āϏāĻŽāĻ°ā§āĻĨāύ āĻ•āϰāĻŋāĨ¤ (R 2.1)

View Info Slide
12%
29%
2 Aff wins 5 Neg wins
balance inconclusive
15%
9%
5 Aff vetoes 3 Neg vetoes
balance inconclusive

āϝ⧇ āĻŽāĻžāύāĻŦāϜāĻžāϤāĻŋāϰ CT āϏāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻ­āĻžāϰ⧇ āϤāĻžāĻĻ⧇āϰ āϏāĻ¤ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻŦāĻžāϕ⧇ āφāĻĒāϞ⧋āĻĄ āĻ•āϰāĻž āωāϚāĻŋā§ŽāĨ¤ (R 2.2)

View Info Slide
12%
12%
2 Aff wins 2 Neg wins
balance inconclusive
12%
12%
4 Aff vetoes 4 Neg vetoes
balance inconclusive

āϝ⧇ āωāĻĒāϝ⧋āĻ—āĻŦāĻžāĻĻ(Utilitarianism) āύ⧈āϤāĻŋāĻ• āĻĻāĻŋāĻ•āύāĻŋāĻ°ā§āĻĻ⧇āĻļāύāĻžāϰ āϜāĻ¨ā§āϝ (moral guidance ) āύ⧀āϤāĻŋāĻļāĻžāĻ¸ā§āĻ¤ā§āϰ āĻ…āĻĒ⧇āĻ•ā§āώāĻž (Deontology) āĻ…āϧāĻŋāĻ• āύāĻŋāĻ°ā§āĻ­āϰāϝ⧋āĻ—ā§āϝ āĻĒāĻĻā§āϧāϤāĻŋāĨ¤ (R 2.3)

24%
12%
4 Aff wins 2 Neg wins
balance inconclusive
9%
6%
3 Aff vetoes 2 Neg vetoes
balance inconclusive
Round 3

āϝ⧇ LGBTQIA+ āϏāĻŽā§āĻĒā§āϰāĻĻāĻžāϝāĻŧ⧇āϰ āϏāĻ•ā§āϰāĻŋāϝāĻŧāĻ­āĻžāĻŦ⧇ “āĻ—ā§āϞāĻžāϏ āĻ•ā§āϞ⧋āĻœā§‡āĻŸâ€ āĻœā§€āĻŦāύāϧāĻžāϰāĻž āύāĻŋāϝāĻŧ⧇ āĻ…āύ⧁āĻļā§‹āϚāύāĻž āĻ•āϰāĻž āωāϚāĻŋāϤāĨ¤ (R3.1)

View Info Slide
6%
24%
1 Aff win 4 Neg wins
balance inconclusive
12%
6%
4 Aff vetoes 2 Neg vetoes
balance inconclusive

āϝ⧇ āĻāĻ•āϜāύ āĻŦāĻŋāĻļāĻŋāĻˇā§āϟ āύāĻžāϰ⧀ āĻŦā§āϝāĻžāĻŦāϏāĻžā§Ÿā§€ āĻ•āĻŋāĻ‚āĻŦāĻž āϰāĻžāϜāύ⧈āϤāĻŋāĻ• āĻŦā§āϝāĻ•ā§āϤāĻŋāĻ¤ā§āĻŦ⧇āϰ āĻ—ā§āϞāĻžāϏ āĻ•ā§āϞāĻŋāĻĢ⧇āϰ āĻĒāĻĻā§‹āĻ¨ā§āύāϤāĻŋ āĻ—ā§āϰāĻšāĻŖ āĻ•āϰāĻž āωāϚāĻŋā§Ž āĨ¤ (R3.2)

View Info Slide
6%
6%
1 Aff win 1 Neg win
balance inconclusive
15%
24%
5 Aff vetoes 8 Neg vetoes
imbalanced at 50% level

āϝ⧇ āύāĻžāϰ⧀āĻŦāĻžāĻĻā§€ āφāĻ¨ā§āĻĻā§‹āϞāύ⧇āϰ āϏāĻžāĻŽāĻžāϜāĻŋāĻ• āύāĻ°ā§āĻŽ āĻĒāϰāĻŋāĻŦāĻ°ā§āϤāύ⧇āϰ āĻšā§‡āϝāĻŧ⧇ āĻ¸ā§āĻŸā§āϰāĻžāĻ•āϚāĻžāϰāĻžāϞ āϰāĻŋāĻĢāĻ°ā§āĻŽāϕ⧇ āĻ…āĻ—ā§āϰāĻžāϧāĻŋāĻ•āĻžāϰ āĻĻ⧇āĻ“āϝāĻŧāĻž āωāϚāĻŋāϤ (R3.3)

View Info Slide
29%
29%
5 Aff wins 5 Neg wins
probably balanced
9%
6%
3 Aff vetoes 2 Neg vetoes
balance inconclusive
Round 4

Motion 1. āϝ⧇ āϜāĻŋāĻŽāĻŋ āĻ•āĻŋāĻŽā§‡āϞ⧇āϰ āĻĒ⧁āύāϰāĻžā§Ÿ āϤāĻžāϰ āϟāĻ•-āĻļā§‹ āϤ⧇ āĻĢāĻŋāϰ⧇ āφāϏāĻž āωāϚāĻŋā§Ž āύ⧟ (4.1)

View Info Slide
12%
12%
2 Aff wins 2 Neg wins
balance inconclusive
9%
9%
3 Aff vetoes 3 Neg vetoes
balance inconclusive

Motion 2 āϝ⧇ āĻŸā§āϰāĻžāĻŽā§āĻĒ āĻĒā§āϰāĻļāĻžāϏāύ āĻšāĻŋāϏ⧇āĻŦ⧇ ⧍ā§Ļ⧍ā§Ŧ āϏāĻžāϞ⧇āϰ āĻŽāĻŋāĻĄāϟāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻŽ āχāϞ⧇āĻ•āĻļāύ⧇āϰ āĻĒā§‚āĻ°ā§āĻŦ⧇ āĻĒā§āϝāĻžāϞ⧇āĻ¸ā§āϟāĻžāχāύ-āϕ⧇ āϰāĻžāĻ¸ā§āĻŸā§āϰ āĻšāĻŋāϏ⧇āĻŦ⧇ āĻ¸ā§āĻŦā§€āĻ•ā§ƒāϤāĻŋ āĻĻāĻŋāĻŦ⧇āĨ¤ (4.2)

View Info Slide
6%
35%
1 Aff win 6 Neg wins
balance inconclusive
21%
9%
7 Aff vetoes 3 Neg vetoes
imbalanced at 50% level

Motion 3 āϝ⧇ ⧍ā§Ģ āϏāĻžāϞ⧇āϰ āύāĻŋāωāĻ‡ā§ŸāĻ°ā§āĻ• āĻŽā§‡ā§Ÿāϰ āύāĻŋāĻ°ā§āĻŦāĻžāϚāύ⧇ āĻœā§‹āĻšāϰāĻžāύ āĻŽāĻžāĻŽāĻĻāĻžāύāĻŋ āĻŦāĻŋāϜ⧟ āϞāĻžāĻ­ āĻ•āϰāϞ⧇ āĻĄā§‡āĻŽā§‹āĻ•ā§āĻ°ā§āϝāĻžāϟāĻĻ⧇āϰ āĻ­āĻžāϞ⧋āϰ āĻšā§‡ā§Ÿā§‡ āĻ•ā§āώāϤāĻŋ āĻŦ⧇āĻļāĻŋ āĻšāĻŦ⧇āĨ¤ (4.3)

View Info Slide
18%
18%
3 Aff wins 3 Neg wins
balance inconclusive
15%
1 Aff veto 5 Neg vetoes
balance inconclusive
Quarter Final

1 (QF)

50%
50%
2 Aff wins 2 Neg wins
balance inconclusive
No teams vetoed this motion